The Mismeasure of Change
Better Cognitive Measurement Instruments Are Urgently Needed for Multiple Sclerosis Research
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Cognitive impairment is an intractable and debilitating symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) for which effective treatments are sorely lacking. We currently have more than 18 FDA-approved disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) with demonstrated efficacy for reducing the risk of relapse and maintaining neurologic function. None is approved for the treatment of cognition, although patients and clinicians commonly identify cognition as a treatment priority when considering DMT use.1 Increasingly, clinical trials are incorporating cognitive tests as secondary outcome measures; however, a recent meta-analysis that included 41 studies found overall benefits of DMTs for cognition to be only small to moderate.2 In this issue of Neurology®, Castrogiovanni et al.3 publish a study that analyzed cognitive outcomes from DECIDE, a randomized controlled trial comparing subcutaneous daclizumab and intramuscular interferon beta-1a in 1,814 patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Two cognitive measures were used: the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), a cognitive screener and the most common measure of cognition in MS, and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), a test involving working memory, math calculation, auditory attention, word retrieval, and speech production. For more than a decade, the use of the PASAT in MS has been discouraged because of poor tolerability and suboptimal psychometric properties.4 Patients in both treatment arms showed steady performance improvements across up to 6 time points from baseline to 144-week follow-up on SDMT (mean improvement = +4.9 ± 12.5) and PASAT (+3.3 ± 8.1). Percentage of participants showing cognitive improvement was consistent across several definitions of clinically meaningful change: any change, 4 points, 8 points, and 20% change for SDMT, and any change, 4 points, and 20% change for PASAT. By contrast, performance on the Timed 25-foot Walk Test, a robust and reliable measure of physical disability in RRMS, steadily worsened over the same follow-up periods.
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
See page 12
- Received March 16, 2023.
- Accepted in final form April 4, 2023.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Avalglucosidase Alfa in Patients With Late-Onset Pompe Disease
Dr. Marianne de Visser and Dr. Maudy Theunissen