Abstract
Lecanemab, a novel amyloid-sequestering agent, recently received accelerated FDA approval for the treatment of mild Dementia due to Alzheimer Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Approval was based on a large Phase 3 trial, Clarity, which demonstrated reductions in amyloid plaque burden and cognitive decline with lecanemab. Three major concerns should give us pause before adopting this medication: its beneficial effects are small, its harms are substantial and its potential costs are unprecedented.
While lecanemab has a clear and statistically significant effect on cognition, its effect size is small and may not be clinically significant. The magnitude of lecanemab’s cognitive effect is smaller than independent estimates of the minimally important clinical difference, implying that the effect may be imperceptible to a majority of patients and caregivers. Lecanemab’s cognitive effects were numerically smaller than the effect of cholinesterase inhibitors and may be much smaller. The main argument in lecanemab’s favor is that it may lead to greater cognitive benefit over time. While plausible, there is a lack of evidence to support this conclusion.
Lecanemab’s harms are substantial. In Clarity, it caused symptomatic brain edema in 11% and symptomatic intracranial bleeding in 0.5% of participants. These estimates likely significantly underestimate these risks in general practice for three reasons:. 1. Lecanemab likely interacts with other medications that increase bleeding, an effect minimized in Clarity. 2. The Clarity population is much younger than the real-world population with mild AD dementia and MCI (71 years of age vs 85) and bleeding risk increases with age. 3. Bleeding rates in trials are typically much lower than in clinical practice.
Lecanemab’s costs are unprecedented. Its proposed price of $26,500 is based on cost effectiveness analyses with tenuous assumptions. But, even if cost effective, it is likely to result in higher expenditures than any other medication. If its entire target population were treated, the aggregate medication expenditures would be $120 billion USD per year —more than is currently spent on all medications in Medicare Part D.
Before adopting lecanemab, we need to know that lecanemab isn’t less effective, vastly more harmful, and 100x more costly than donepezil.
- Received March 3, 2023.
- Accepted in final form April 26, 2023.
- Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
