Endovascular vs Medical Management for Late Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion With Prestroke Disability
Analysis of CLEAR and RESCUE-Japan
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Current guidelines do not address recommendations for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in the extended time window (>6 hours after time last seen well [TLSW]) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients with preexisting modified Rankin Scale (mRS) > 1. In this study, we evaluated the outcomes of MT vs medical management in patients with prestroke disability presenting in the 6- to 24-hour time window with acute LVO.
Methods We analyzed a multinational cohort (61 sites, 6 countries from 2014 to 2020) of patients with prestroke (or baseline) mRS 2 to 4 and anterior circulation LVO treated 6–24 hours from TLSW. Patients treated in the extended time window with MT vs medical management were compared using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The primary outcome was the return of Rankin (ROR, return to prestroke mRS by 90 days).
Results Of 554 included patients (448 who underwent MT), the median age was 82 years (interquartile range [IQR] 72–87) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 18 (IQR 13–22). In both MV logistic regression and IPTW analysis, MT was associated with higher odds of ROR (adjusted OR [aOR] 3.96, 95% CI 1.78–8.79 and OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.20–7.98, respectively). Among other factors, premorbid mRS 4 was associated with higher odds of ROR (aOR, 3.68, 95% CI 1.97–6.87), while increasing NIHSS (aOR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86–0.94) and decreasing Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scale score (aOR per point 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.99) were associated with lower odds of ROR. Age, intravenous thrombolysis, and occlusion location were not associated with ROR.
Discussion In patients with preexisting disability presenting in the 6- to 24-hour time window, MT is associated with a higher probability of returning to baseline function compared with medical management.
Classification of Evidence This investigation's results provide Class III evidence that in patients with preexisting disability presenting 6–24 hours from the TLSW and acute anterior LVO stroke, there may be a benefit of MT over medical management in returning to baseline function.
Glossary
- ASPECTS=
- Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scale;
- CLEAR=
- CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion;
- IPTW=
- inverse probability of treatment weighting;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- IVT=
- intravenous thrombolysis;
- LVO=
- large vessel occlusion;
- MCA=
- middle cerebral artery;
- mRS=
- modified Rankin Scale;
- MT=
- mechanical thrombectomy;
- MV=
- multivariable;
- NIHSS=
- National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale;
- PS=
- propensity score;
- RESCUE-Japan Registry 2=
- Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism Japan Registry 2;
- ROR=
- return of Rankin;
- SMR=
- standardized mortality ratio;
- TLSW=
- time last seen well;
- UW=
- utility weighted
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was José Merino, MD, MPhil, FAAN.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received March 10, 2022.
- Accepted in final form September 26, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Author Response: Endovascular vs Medical Management for Late Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion With Prestroke Disability: Analysis of CLEAR and RESCUE-Japan
- James E. Siegler, Physician, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, USA
- Simon Nagel, Physician, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Thanh N. Nguyen, Physician, Boston Medical Center, Boston, USA
Submitted December 14, 2022 - Reader Response: Endovascular vs medical management for late anterior large vessel occlusion with prestroke disability: analysis of CLEAR and RESCUE-Japan
- Askiel Bruno, Neurologist, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University
- Fenwick T Nichols, Neurologist, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University
Submitted November 28, 2022
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Steven Greenberg and Dr. Erika Williams
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.